Tweet This, Post to LinkedIn, and Like This!

Showing posts with label pembroke pines chiropractor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pembroke pines chiropractor. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 10, 2017

Statin Use Increases Odds of Back Disorder: Cohort Study

This is not new news, however this is further evidence that statin drugs (cholesterol lowering drugs) are associated with back pain.  The article goes on to state that statins have now been shown to be related to a greater risk of "spondylosis, intervertebral disc disorders, herniated discs, and spinal stenosis,"  whereas before, the use of statins were associated with back pain without arthritis.  
Chiropractors, don't overlook the use of cholesterol lowering drugs when trying to find the cause of your patient's back pain.  


Statin Use Increases Odds of Back Disorder: Cohort Study

Marlene Busko
May 08, 2017
DALLAS, TX — In a large observational study of insured individuals in the military and their family members, statin use was associated with increased odds of having a back disorder, including spondylosis, intervertebral disc disorders, herniated discs, and spinal stenosis[1].
Specifically, for every 17 individuals who were prescribed a statin, one person had a diagnosed back disorder, in this study published online May 1, 2017 as a research letter in JAMA Internal Medicine.
"Some of these adverse effects [from statins] can greatly impact day-to-day quality of life for our patients," especially in those who are physically active, lead author Dr Una E Makris (VA North Texas Health Care System and UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas) told heartwire from Medscape in an email. "We hope that musculoskeletal adverse events will be part of the patient-provider discussion on the risk/benefit ratio" of these drugs.
"Our results provide additional motivation to further investigate the overall influence of statin therapy on musculoskeletal health, specifically if prescribed for primary prevention in physically active individuals," the researchers summarize.

 Can Statins Cause Back Pain?

Two previous studies based on NHANES data reported that statin use was associated with musculoskeletal pain including back pain among individuals without arthritis[2,3].
Severe back pain is both debilitating and costly. In 2005, it was estimated that back pain cost the healthcare system more than $100 billion, Makris noted.
The researchers retrieved data from 60,455 individuals who were at least 30 years old, lived in the San Antonio area, and were enrolled in the TRICARE health insurance system from 2003 to 2012. Of these, 17% were active military personnel and the rest were family members and veterans.
About one in six individuals (10,910) had been prescribed a statin, usually simvastatin (in 72% of prescriptions), and on average, they had been taking this drug for 3.7 years.
The researchers matched 6728 statin users with an equal number of statin nonusers. They had a mean age of 52 and 47% were women. A quarter were overweight or obese; 53% had hypertension; 20% had diabetes; and 40% had osteoarthritis.
Close to a third (30%) had a back disorder.
In the propensity-matched cohort, being prescribed a statin (as opposed to not being prescribed this drug) significantly raised the odds of having a back disorder (odds ratio 1.27; 95% CI 1.19–1.36).
In the overall cohort and in prespecified subgroups (such as nonobese individuals, healthy individuals, or those without musculoskeletal conditions at baseline, statin use was consistently associated with increased odds of being diagnosed with a back disorder.
In an analysis of the overall cohort, but with adjustment for propensity scores, the risk increase for a back disorder went from 30% among statin users to 47% among those taking high-intensity statins. It also increased with duration to as high as 59% with >4 years of use.
Adjusted* Odds Ratio (OR) of a Back Disorder, Statin Users vs Nonusers
GroupOR (95% CI)*
Overall cohort1.30 (1.23–1.38)
>2 y statin use1.47 (1.39–1.56)
>4 y statin use1.59 (1.47–1.71)
High-intensity statin1.47 (1.34–1.62)
*Adjusted for propensity score, medications used, and use of revascularization procedures during follow-up
"Further prospective studies are needed to better understand the mechanism of how statins can contribute to back disorder diagnoses," said Makris.
"We are not advocating for taking patients off statins if they have cardiovascular risk factors. As clinicians we should be aware of these potential associations and understand the spectrum of potential adverse effects."
The study was supported by grants and awards from the US Department of Veterans Affairs, the National Institutes of Health, the UT Southwestern Center, VA Health Services Research and Development, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The authors report that they have no relevant financial relationships.



http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/879387?nlid=114770_4502&src=wnl_dne_170509_mscpedit&uac=5165DT&impID=1344127&faf=1

Thursday, January 19, 2017

Another Insurance Scam Story....I'm so tired of this.

I'm Fired Up

It's been a while since I posted, but yesterday something happened which fired me up, and not it a good way.  One of my patients came in and told me about some lady he heard of, who had a car accident a few weeks ago.  This person lives somewhere in Cutler Ridge, which is South West Dade County, FL.

So, she had an accident, and she is now treating at a chiro office with her boyfriend, who was the passenger.  So, for a few minutes we were discussing the way the PIP works, and difference between first party insurance, and the at fault party's insurance, etc.  And then, out of the blue, my patient asked me about the $2000 dollars that this woman got, and the $2000 her boyfriend got, UP FRONT for their "settlement", at the chiro office.  The reason my patient was asking about this, is because, as an ex insurance utilization employee, he was wondering why these two people were ALSO told to come in to the office five times a week, for what appeared to him to be a minor car accident.

Now, I am a pretty calm person 99% of the time.  Very mellow.  Maybe even too mellow.

Considering the unbelievable nature of this story, I actually think I controlled myself fairly well.  But, I think that by the end of the visit with my patient, he was a little rattled up, because he has never seen this side of me.

As a doctor who has been practicing chiropractic for over 20 years now, I feel I have a good grasp of the way these scams work.  And, if you are reading this and you are not either a doctor or a lawyer, and you are maybe a little naive, I will explain to you what is actually happening at this office in Miami with these patients, and probably also to lot of other patients who are coming in for treatment over there.

This is likely the sequence of events and facts that surround this crime:

The patients are in their car and are in an accident.  Maybe the accident was staged, maybe not.

The injured patients called one of the lawyers who advertise on TV during the time when the Jerry Springer Show, or similar is on.  Or, maybe they called 411-Pain, 1-800-NEED-HELP or one of the other ones that are popular these days. The patients THEN are referred to a doctor's office and are told that the office will take very good care of them.

The doctor's office looks at the "case"after also communicating with the lawyer's office and realizes the at-fault party has a small or bad insurance company, or maybe that at-fault vehicle has no insurance at all.   However, the patients have one of the larger carrier well known insurance companies like Allstate, Geico, State Farm, or Progressive.   From this very quick investigation, the office quickly learns that the patients have a very bad case because of the bad coverage on the other side, and the patient's policy has no uninsured motorist coverage, but the two patients do have $10,000 in coverage, EACH, in fact.

Since the doctor's office knows that if the patients find out they have a bad case, they won't come in for treatment, the office offers the patients up front cash to come in, and come in frequently and a lot, so the office can quickly bill through the entire insurance benefit until the insurance benefit is exhausted.

There is also a possibility that this inducement or kickback is also provided when the patient actually KNOWS they have no case.  YES, lots of times patients know about their lousy case, and these patients come in expecting this cash kickback, for simply becoming a patient, because they heard that some offices do this.  In other words, they shop around for it, until they find an office who will pay them, and an office that will pay the most.

Either way the kickback is provided because the doctor knows that the patient will have no "incentive to treat" because they really don't have pain, but they just want money.

So, the doctor's office pays out $4000 and then bills $20,000.  This leaves the office with $16,000.

Yes, this scam happens.  Not always, but it does happen.  For those who are reading this and are thinking that all personal injury is a scam, YOU ARE WRONG about that.  Please don't group the legit medical and legal offices with total scam insurance fraud scheme offices.  It is unfortunate, but there are bad players in every profession.

The truth is that there are patients who are injured and who are treated correctly, legally, professionally, and who are helped.  You just have to make sure you go to a good office, and if you are using an attorney to help compensate you for your injury, you go to a good, and legit attorney.

If you are a patient and are tempted to accept a kickback from the medical office or someone working outside the medical office, be aware, that not only is the office committing insurance fraud, but YOU ARE TOO.  This means that you will be subject to prosecution and face the possibility of jail time, the same as the person who gave you the money.  And if you think you will not get caught, THINK AGAIN.  The insurance companies and the insurance fraud task force know the offices who are doing this, and they are waiting for the right time to rush into the office with guns drawn, and with the news crew present, to make an example out of you, and place your face and name on the front page of the news paper and the 5 o'clock news, and RUIN YOUR LIFE.

I have been treating patients who have been injured in car accidents for over 20 years.  If you would like information, please call my office and I would be happy to discuss how I can help you, the right way.

Professionally yours,
Dr. Alan Himmel



Thursday, March 10, 2016

Will Florida PIP Cover Me if I am Traveling out of Florida?

Will Florida PIP Cover Me if I am Traveling out of Florida?

In your own car: YES.
In a car that is not yours, including a rental: NO
In Mexico:  NO
In Canada:  YES


Here is a scenario:  You are a Florida resident and have a Florida registered and insured car and travel north to go skiing in the Smoky Mountains.   You decide to pile your family into the family SUV, and make a trip. You manage to get through Florida and Georgia safely, but when you get into Tennessee, someone runs a red light and smashes into your car causing injuries. In this scenario, you were in your own car, so there IS coverage for you and your family.

Let's say you find that there is no snow in North Carolina and decide to travel into Canada?  Yes, there is PIP coverage for injuries to you and your family if you have an accident in Canada.


HOWEVER, lets say you decide to FLY to North Carolina, and rent a car.  You have an accident in North Carolina while occupying a rental car.  NO, there is no coverage under your Florida PIP policy. Same is true if you are in a friend's car in NC, It's not your car, so no PIP. 

Let's say you are in your relative's car in NC, providing that the relative is a NC resident, No Florida PIP here either.  How about if you are in a relative's car in NC and the relative is a Florida resident with car insurance coming from Florida?  No coverage here either unless you and the relative LIVE together.

In Mexico in your own car and there is NO coverage.

In regard to resident relatives:  There are some companies that will deny a claim if they determine that the policyholder did not disclose all people in the household when the policy was purchased.  They will deny the claim based on "material misrepresentation."    So, always let the company know all people living in the house, no matter if the addition of these extra people in the house will increase the cost of the policy.  If you hide this information from them, they will find out and may deny your claim.


I'm not a lawyer.  I am a chiropractor with 26 years experience treating auto accident patients, and I have been exposed to many different coverage scenarios.  Get all legal opinions from a licensed attorney.

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

Can Whiplash Cause Concussion?

Can Whiplash Cause Concussion?

Dr. Alan Himmel

Talked about it before.  Let's talk about it again.  Can a mild whiplash cause a concussion?  The literature says, yes.  And, I have had several patients over the years, and one currently, who has the affects of post concussion syndrome.

Attorneys who represent injury clients need to be aware of this issue as well.  The most recent patient that I am treating who I am sure has suffered a concussion, has all of the symptoms of this injury, including headache, vertigo, disorientation, and confusion.  This will be a patient who will tell you that their head just doesn't feel the same since the accident.  It can be very frustrating to the patient, and the patient may find themselves searching doctors who could figure it out.  Oddly enough, attorneys will very often dismiss concussion, wanting to focus the claim on disc injuries and the usual soft tissue findings. Why?

I think that the major sticking point for attorneys is simply not understanding the physics involved in a car accident, and not knowing what a concussion actually is.

You don't have to strike your head against the inside of the car and you don't have to get hit in the head by something to cause concussion.  Think of it like this:  The brain is encased within the skull and around the brain is a thin layer of fluid which separates the brain from the inside of the skull so it does not touch (among other purposes of the fluid). The fluid is called cerebral spinal fluid or CSF.  So, the brain, in a way, is swimming in this fluid and the small fluid space between the brain and the inside surface of the skull is like a barrier because you don't want the brain to touch anything.

Okay, now think about what will happen to a person's head when at rest, when the car he is in is hit from behind.  The person's head will move in the direction of where the force came from.  This is one of Newton's laws of motion.  Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.  But, what about the brain which is "floating" within the skull?  It too, must obey the laws of physics, and at this point, the brain will then crash into the inside of the skull on the opposite side.  Right there is your concussion.

Concussion mechanics.svg

Now, keep in mind that concussion is not always possible to see on MRI or CAT scan.  Concussion is regularly diagnosed based on neurological symptoms, signs, and complaints.  Lawyers and insurance companies want objective proof, but they cannot always have it with concussion.  The lawyer who is representing the client with concussion, must be aware of these things.  A lawyer who is representing injury clients must be an expert in the law, and although its not required to be trained like a physician, he should also have a working knowledge of different types of injuries involved.

So, keep an eye out for a concussion when whiplash is involved.  They are generally not life threatening, but concussions can be quite serious, and recurrent concussions can be even worse.

I can be reached at 954-659-8600

My office address is:

Alan Himmel, DC, PA.
3161 Dykes Road
Miramar, FL. 33027

Saturday, May 11, 2013

Patient Brokering, Kickbacks, etc. First time in almost 8 years I get a call.

KICKBACKS, PATIENT BROKERING, SOLICITATION...  


Dr. Alan Himmel

I got one of those calls today.  You know, one of THOSE calls.  And, the call came in early on a Saturday morning from an area code that is a few hundred miles north of here.  Naturally, I answered the phone, like I always do, because phone calls to my office are forwarded to my cell phone which sits on my nightstand charging all night.  I never want to miss a call from a patient or a prospective NEW patient.

So, I answer the phone and the he introduces himself and asks me if I am seeing patients today.  I actually had plans to go to the beach, which is where I ultimately ended up anyway, but if someone needed me and it is a new patient, I would actually change my plans, if it was necessary.  Okay, getting back to the phone call:  He had a foreign accent but spoke pretty good english.  He told me there were two patients looking for a doctor to treat their injuries.  My next question to him was, "what type of injuries?"  I actually knew where this was going right from the beginning, but I had to ask.  Believe it or not, I haven't had a call like this in years, or at all, at Miramar Chiropractic.  Well, I haven't had a call like this since I left Dade County, which was about 8 years ago.  I am so glad I am out of there.  Dade County is such a cesspool of horrible insurance companies and desperate people, who seem to have nothing at all to lose.

So he said to me, it was a car accident.  I said, "Sure, I can see the patients; when can they come in?"

 So far so good, right?

He then told me he would like to have the patients come in, but he doesn't want to speak on the phone.  He wants to meet in person to speak privately.  And, he then said he actually has more patients... "about ten more, possibly."

Hmmm.  What to do, what to do?   Lets see.  It's pretty obvious by now what this guy is up to, even though he hasn't come directly out and said anything.  Do I pay a kickback to a guy for patients, which is fraud, is a felony, and would wind me up in prison?  Or, do I tell him to go take a hike?  Easy!  I chose the latter.

For those of you out there (doctors and lawyers, and everyone else) who do this stuff on a daily basis because you think its okay, let me put this into perspective:  First, I have to assume that if you are a professional, like a lawyer or a doctor, you are a fairly intelligent person.  Its not easy to get into professional school, get passing grades, get licensed, etc.  This is something that takes a certain degree of smarts, because if it didn't, everyone would be doing it, and they're not.  Secondly, what I don't understand, and probably never will, is WHY a doctor or a lawyer would risk EVERYTHING by committing fraud, and creating potentially the worse nightmare imaginable when the police come and slap handcuffs on them.  Even though its still wrong, I can see a desperate person, with nothing to lose doing this.  But WHY would a doctor or a lawyer do this?  You know, if every lawyer and doctor would refuse to participate in illegal kickbacks, then the dirtbags on the street who are doing this, would be forced to look for another career and possibly, just possibly, the Florida No-Fault system would be in better shape.  Those of you who are doing this type of non-sense, are responsible for the terrible changes to the no-fault system, and ultimately the repeal, which could happen eventually.  I have a family and bills to pay.  I resent you assholes who are ruining it for me.  I have a big problem with this and yes, I do take it personally, because what you are doing is taking food off my family's plate.

Keep yourself clean.  Refuse this illegal activity, even if you think you will never get caught. You will be able to sleep comfortably at night, and you will not propagate this type of activity, which is pathetic and ruins it for everyone in the long run.

Thursday, January 31, 2013

HB 119 — Florida Personal Injury Protection PIP No-Fault


CS/CS/HB 119 — Motor Vehicle Personal Injury Protection Insurance

by Economic Affairs Committee; Insurance and Banking Subcommittee; and Rep. Boyd and others (CS/CS/SB 1860 by Budget Committee; Banking and Insurance Committee; and Senator Negron)

This summary is provided for information only and does not represent the opinion of any Senator, Senate Officer, or Senate Office.
Prepared by: Banking and Insurance Committee (BI)
Senate Bill 1860 revises the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law. The bill primarily amends laws governing Personal Injury Protection (PIP) benefits under the No-Fault law and laws related to PIP motor-vehicle insurance fraud. The major changes enacted by the bill are as follows:
 PIP Medical Benefits
The bill revises the provision of Personal Injury Protection medical benefits under the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law, effective January 1, 2013. Individuals seeking PIP medical benefits are required to receive initial services and care within 14 days after the motor vehicle accident. Initial services and care are only reimbursable if lawfully provided, supervised, ordered or prescribed by a licensed physician, licensed osteopathic physician, licensed chiropractic physician, licensed dentist, or must be rendered in a hospital, a facility that owns or is owned by a hospital, or a licensed emergency transportation and treatment provider. Follow up services and care require a referral from such providers and must be consistent with the underlying medical diagnosis rendered when the individual received initial services and care.
The bill applies two different coverage limits for PIP medical benefits, based upon the severity of the medical condition of the individual. An individual may receive up to $10,000 in medical benefits for services and care if a physician, osteopathic physician, dentist, physician’s assistant or advanced registered nurse practitioner has determined that the injured person had an emergency medical condition. An emergency medical condition is defined as a medical condition manifesting itself by acute symptoms of sufficient severity that the absence of immediate medical attention could reasonably be expected to result in serious jeopardy to patient health, serious impairment to bodily functions, or serious dysfunction of a body organ or part. An individual who is not diagnosed with an emergency medical condition, the PIP medical benefit limit is $2,500. Massage and acupuncture are not reimbursable, regardless of who the type of provider rendering such services.
PIP Death Benefit
Personal Injury Protection now offers $5,000 in death benefits in addition to $10,000 in medical and disability benefits. Previously, the death benefit was the lesser of the unused PIP benefits, up to a limit of $5,000. The increased death benefit is effective January 1, 2013.
PIP Medical Fee Schedule
The bill revises provisions related to the PIP medical fee schedule in an effort to resolve alleged ambiguities in the schedule that have led to conflicts and litigation between claimants and insurers. The bill clarifies that the reimbursement levels for care provided by ambulatory surgical centers and clinical laboratories and for durable medical equipment is 200 percent of the appropriate Medicare Part B schedule. The Medicare fee schedule on effect on March 1 will be the applicable fee schedule for the remainder of that year until the subsequent update. Insurers are authorized to use Medicare coding policies and payment methodologies of the Centers for Medicare and Medicare Services, including applicable modifiers, when applying the fee schedule if they do not constitute a utilization limit. The bill also requires insurers to include notice of the fee schedule in their policies. These provisions are effective January 1, 2013.
Attorney Fees
The bill amends provisions related to attorney fee awards in No-Fault disputes. The bill prohibits the application of attorney fee multipliers. The offer of judgment statute, s. 768.79, F.S., is applied to No-Fault cases, providing statutory authority for insurers to recover fees if the plaintiff’s recovery does not exceed the insurer’s settlement offer by a statutorily specified percentage. The bill maintains current law allowing a party that obtains a favorable judgment from an insurer to recover reasonable attorney fees from the insurer. The bill also requires that the attorney fees awarded must comply with prevailing professional standards, not overstate or inflate the number of hours reasonably necessary for a case of comparable skill or complexity, and represent legal services that are reasonable to achieve the result obtained.
Investigation and Payment of Claims
Provisions relating to the investigation of PIP claims by insurers are revised, effective January 1, 2013. Insurers are authorized to take an examination under oath (EUO) of an insured. Compliance is a condition precedent for receiving benefits (the insurer owes zero benefits if the insured does not comply). An insurer that unreasonably requests EUOs as a general business practice, as determined by the Office of Insurance Regulation (OIR), is subject to s. 626.9541, F.S. of the Unfair Insurance Trade Practices Act. The bill also provides that if a person unreasonably fails to appear for an independent medical examination (IME), the carrier is no longer responsible for benefits. Refusal or failure to appear for two IMEs raises a rebuttable presumption that the refusal or failure was unreasonable.
Changes are made to the statutory process for the payment of PIP benefits, primarily to assist claimants in their claim submissions, effective January 1, 2013. A claimant whose claim is denied due to an error in the claim is given 15 additional days to correct the erroneous claim and resubmit it timely. The insurer must maintain a log of all PIP benefits paid on behalf of the insured and must provide the log to the insured upon his or her request if litigation has initiated. If a dispute between insurers and insureds occurs, the insurer must provide notice within 15 days of the exhaustion of PIP benefits. Insurers must reimburse Medicaid within 30 days. The electronic submission of records is authorized, effective December 1, 2012.
Prevention of PIP-Related Insurance Fraud
House Bill 119 contains numerous provisions designed to curtail PIP fraud. The bill defines insurance fraud as knowingly presenting a PIP claim to an insurer for payment or other benefits on behalf of a person or entity that committed fraud when applying for health care clinic licensure, seeking an exemption from clinic licensure, or demonstrating compliance with the Health Care Clinic Law. Claims that are unlawful under the patient brokering law (s. 817.505, F.S.) are not reimbursable under the No-Fault Law. A health care practitioner found guilty of insurance fraud under s. 817.234, F.S., loses his or her license for 5 years and may not receive PIP reimbursement for 10 years. Insurers are provided an additional 60 days (90 total) to investigate suspected fraudulent claims, however, an insurer that ultimately pays the claim must also pay an interest penalty.
All entities seeking reimbursement under the No-Fault Law must obtain health care clinic licensure except for hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers, entities owned or wholly owned by a hospital, clinical facilities affiliated with an accredited medical school and practices wholly owned by a physician, dentist, or chiropractic physician or by such physicians and specified family members. The bill creates standards for evaluating whether an entity claiming it is exempt from the requirement to obtain clinic licensure is actually wholly owned by a physician.
The bill defines failure to pay PIP claims within the time limits of s. 627.736(4)(b), F.S., as an unfair and deceptive practice. The OIR may order restitution to the insured or provider, but is not limited in its other administrative penalties, which may include suspending the insurer’s certificate of authority.
Law enforcement is required to complete a long-form crash report when there is an indication of pain or discomfort by any party to a crash. All crash reports completed by law enforcement must identify the vehicle in which each party was a driver or passenger. For all crashes that do not require a law enforcement report, the vehicle driver must submit a report on the crash to the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles within 10 days of the crash.
The bill creates a non-profit direct support organization, the Automobile Insurance Fraud Strike Force, which can accept private donations for the purposes of preventing, investigating, and prosecuting motor vehicle insurance fraud. Monies raised by the Strike Force may fund the salaries of insurance fraud investigators, prosecutors, and support personnel so long as such grants or expenditures do not interfere with prosecutorial independence. Funds may not be used to advertise using the likeness or name of any elected official or for lobbying.
Mandatory Rate Filings and Data Call
The Office of Insurance Regulation must contract with a consulting firm to calculate the expected savings from the act, which must be presented to the Governor and Legislature by September 15, 2012. By October 1, 2012, each insurer that writes private passenger automobile personal injury protection insurance must submit a rate filing. If the insurer requests a rate that does not provide at least a 10 percent reduction of its current rate, it must explain in detail its reasons for failing to achieve those savings. A second rate filing must be made by January 1, 2014. If the insurer requests a rate that does not provide at least a 25 percent reduction of the rate that was in effect on July 1, 2012, it must explain in detail its reasons for failing to achieve those savings. The Office of Insurance Regulation must order an insurer to stop writing new PIP policies if the insurer requests a rate in excess of the statutorily required rate reduction and fails to provide a detailed explanation for that failure. The Office of Insurance Regulation must perform a comprehensive PIP data call and publish the results by January 1, 2015. The data call will analyze the impact of the act’s reforms on the PIP insurance market.
If approved by the Governor, these provisions take effect July 1, 2012, except as otherwise provided.
Vote: Senate 22-17; House 80-34

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

FL PIP "EMERGENCY MEDICAL CONDITION" (EMC) FORM

FLORIDA PIP "EMERGENCY MEDICAL CONDITION" (EMC) FORM

Dr. Alan Himmel

If you are looking for a Florida PIP medical condition form, there isn't one.




At least, not yet.

 As of today, which actually is Jan 15, 2013, (the deadline if you had your accident on Jan 1 and have not seen a doctor yet), the Florida department of insurance or the department of financial services have not issued a standard form.  Also, they have not even recommended to the insurance carriers that there should be a standard form.  Therefore, if you are a doctor who treats auto injury trauma patients, you wouldn't have any idea where to make the statement of an emergency medical condition or not.  Common sense would say that there should be a standard form or something should be written in the notes.  I had one insurance adjuster for Allstate tell me that it should be put on the claim form.  When I asked him where, he told me he did not know.  There are no extra boxes to designate emergency on a HCFA 1500 form, and there certainly are no extra boxes to write in how the injury fits the EMC definition as we have been reading it.  You can put in your diagnosis codes there, but that's all.

Hypothetically, it would be more realistic for the doctor to write in his chart note something like:

"I have examined this patient and have given the diagnosis of "brain concussion", with the symptoms of loss of balance, inability to concentrate, nausea, severe headache, etc., and have determined that this condition may cause serious jeopardy to the patient's health.  Thus, this patient has a severe injury which is an emergency medical condition."



This is probably the best bet at this point since there has been no instruction to the doctors about how this should be done.

Of course, any insurance company can tell you that your "emergency medical condition" is not severe enough.  Those insurance companies will disregard your doctor's EMC and limit you to 25% of the coverage you paid for, but that's another story.

This is only my opinion, and not advice.    I hope it helps.

Pembroke Pines Chiropractic
954-659-8600
305-979-5549